Intel mobile cpu comparison
In multi-core value the 11400 wins again by a hefty margin: 57.8 to 44.8. This gives the Rya single-core value score of 6.0, while the i5-11400 scores a pack-leading 7.7. Multicore tests end similarly, with the i5-11400 beating the 3600 by nearly 12% (note that this is when the power limit is raised to 125W in BIOS when capped at 65W the 11400 obviously performs much lower in multicore tests). In single-core performance the 11400 beats the 3600 quite handily (1401 to 1253), despite its lower price tag. Meanwhile, the i5-11400 features integrated graphics, while the 3600 doesn’t. The Rycan be overclocked, while the 11400 cannot. The R5 3600 retails for around $210 (AMD doesn’t publish official recommended retail prices, so we’re forced to base retail price on the going rate of most major vendors), while the i5-11400 costs $182. Some claim that the last-gen Ryfills this role, so let’s see how these two stack up against each other.īoth CPUs are 6-core, 12-thread processors with very similar capabilities. The problem is, the Core i5-11400 doesn’t have a true current-gen AMD competitor, and it’d be quite boring to do no comparison at all. This article is supposed to be comparing Ryzen’s 5000-series to Intel’s 11th-gen CPUs, and the 3600 is part of the 3000-series. Now, let’s compare the CPUs within each specific tier. These are pretty intuitive the performance winner is the better of the two, not accounting for price, while the value winner is the CPU that offers the best performance per dollar. We’ll choose a winner for each of two categories: performance and value. Scores Overview:īelow is a complete table containing each CPU’s single and multi-core Cinebench scores, value scores, and retail price. If you’re deciding between two processors in a closely-contested tier, we recommend crunching the numbers yourself with current-day pricing for the most precise value metric. Since component prices are constantly fluctuating, we use retail prices when computing value scores. The higher the value score, the more performance you’re getting per dollar. If a given CPU costs $200 and has a single-core Cinebench score of 2,000, it has a single-core value score of 2000/200, or 10. These are calculated by dividing the Cinebench score by the cost of the component. We’ve also computed two “value scores” for each CPU. These values in and of themselves mean very little, but they’re extremely useful for the purpose of comparison.įor example, if processor A has a single-core score of 2,000, while processor B’s single-core benchmark is 1,000, CPU A can be expected to complete single-core tasks at roughly twice the speed of CPU B.Īll Cinebench scores are taken from CPUMonkey’s Cinebench R23 benchmark database and TechPowerup, since these are among the most complete databases on the Internet. Cinebench R23 benchmarks come close to doing this, as they are a consistent and reasonable indicator of a CPU’s capabilities.Ĭinebench tests two values, which it calls single-core and multi-core performance. Cinebench scoresĪ processor’s performance is difficult to quantify with a single metric, since there are so many factors that go into this. Tierīefore we get into the nitty-gritty comparisons, let’s look into the different metrics that will be used. This is both for the purpose of simplicity, and because these models are far less popular than those that we’ve listed. We also excluded the Core i5-11500 and non-K/non-X variations of Intel and Ryzen CPUs, respectively. Note that the Core i5-11400 and Ryzen 9 5950X don’t have a counterpart, and thus win their category by default. For example, the Core i5-11600K and Ryzen 5 5600X are priced closely, and are nearly identical in their capabilities.īelow we’ve laid out each 5000-series CPU with its Intel counterpart, divided into five categories ranging from “budget” to “best”. Now that Rocket Lake is out, with much more comparable performance than Comet Lake managed, we decided we’d compare the two sides’ CPUs.Įvery AMD processor (with the exception of the 5950X) has an Intel counterpart that performs most similarly. However, with the release of AMD’s 5000-series in November of last year they took the clear lead in the CPU Cold War. Up until recently, Intel was without a doubt the champion of CPU performance. Whether you cheer for Team Blue or Team Red, there’s no denying that AMD has made massive strides in the past couple of years.